Times Online and AFP in Paris
Win tickets to the sold-out music festival
A Paris court today acquitted the editor of a satirical French weekly sued by two Muslim groups for publishing cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, in a case seen as a test for freedom of expression.
Applause broke out in the courtroom at the announcement of the verdict, which ruled that three cartoons published by the weekly Charlie Hebdo in February 2006 were not insulting to Muslims.
The Paris Grand Mosque and the Union of Islamic Organisations of France took Philippe Val, the Charlie Hebdo editor, to court for reprinting cartoons that first appeared in a Danish newspaper, sparking angry protests by Muslims worldwide.
They argued that the images drew an offensive link between Islam and terrorism and asked for 30,000 euros (£20,000) in damages.
Mr Val welcomed the ruling and said it would open a much-needed debate among Muslims in France.“If you believe as we do that Islam is perfectly compatible with French democracy, such a debate is a blessing,” he said.
The court ruled that two of the cartoons were absolutely not offensive to Muslims. One, reprinted from Denmark’s Jyllands-Posten, showed the prophet standing on a cloud, turning away suicide bombers from paradise with the caption 'Stop, stop, we ran out of virgins'.
The second, by the French cartoonist Cabu, showed Muhammad sobbing, holding his head in his hands and saying:“It is hard to be loved by fools”, under the caption 'Muhammad overwhelmed by fundamentalists".
On the third cartoon - showing Muhammad wearing a turban shaped as a bomb, and first printed in Jyllands-Posten - the court’s ruling was more nuanced.
The court decided that the caricature could potentially be insulting to Muslims but that the context of its publication in Charlie Hebdo made clear there was no intention to offend.
The president of the Union of Islamic Organisations of France, Lhaj Thami Breze, said following the hearing that he intended to appeal “because we are unhappy with the verdict".
But Christophe Bigot, a lawyer for the Paris Mosque, said that his client would not challenge the court's decision. He said it was a "balanced verdict that respects both the right to caricature and the possibility for a group of people to complain”, adding: “This acquittal only refers to Charlie Hebdo, since the court considered that it intended only to make people laugh, not to cause offence."
The trial was seen as an important test for freedom of expression in France and large crowds crammed into the Paris courtroom during hearings last month to hear the arguments put by both sides.
Candidates in next month’s French presidential election also lined up during the trial to defend their ideas about religion and freedom of expression, while a group of 50 intellectuals including many French Muslims published an open letter urging support for Charlie Hebdo.
The editors of Jyllands-Posten were acquitted in October of any wrongdoing in a separate case in a Danish court and very few of the dozens of newspapers worldwide that reprinted the cartoons have faced legal action.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£38k
Barclaycard
Various Locations
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I'ts okay for "them" (bieng not all but some extreme groups of muslims) to burn our flag (being the oldest national flag off all) on tv, but us picturing the prophet Muhammed in a newspaper (wich is meant for the common dane) is a scandal? Gimme a break, the "power" our natinal symbol is equal or even greater than some pictures drawn for a newspaper, the pictures were never intended to hurt someone.
Does that give me the right to burn their flag next time i see Jesus pictured by them?
Thomas Erfurt, Viborg, Denmark
What were the last words of the miscreants that flew those planes into the WTC? Something to do with (name and address withheld) being great? No link there then.
David Masu, Zürich,
I can't help thinking giles burgess is wrong comparing the offence caused by racial equality, gay rights, evolution, etc. it is not the intention of any of these to cause offence, so they should not be compared with insulting moslems deliberately.
however, s s ali (and the majority of moslem comment), the whole point of the cartoons is that they are not meant merely to insult islam, but rather to insult the hipocrisy or those who claim to follow islam, but are really using it as a cover for their own despicable agenda.
far from being an insult, the cartoons point out that there are "moslems" who are insulting islam and we all find that offensive. what could be more insulting to your prophet than perverting a religion of peace to justify indiscriminate violence again the innocent?
if you want to get upset about something, get upset with the terrorists who abuse your faith and turn everyone against you. not the ones pointing this out.
jem, london, uk
I fly a Danish flag from my balcony each time this discussion re-appears! Interestingly, it's never excited any comment - are the British ignoring this threat to our way of life?
Andy Dyer, London, UK,
Muslims need to be able to take both criticism and mockery. If they cannot, they will be seen by others to be like a person who cannot accept criticism or mockery: immature, over-sensitive, weird, self-obsessed, paranoid, unable to have a good time, twitchy, restless, serious, obsessive, self-important and occasionally hot-headed and violent. We all know individuals like that and their behaviour stems from such a neurosis. Islam as a faith shows many traits similar to this neurotic type and the only medication that works is learning how to be tolerant of others.
Donald Smith , London , UK
I can't help thinking giles burgess is wrong comparing the offence caused by racial equality, gay rights, evolution, etc. it is not the intention of any of these to cause offence, so they should not be compared with insulting moslems deliberately.
however, s s ali (and the majority of moslem comment), the whole point of the cartoons is that they are not meant merely to insult islam, but rather to insult the hypocrisy or those who claim to follow islam, but are really using it as a cover for their own despicable agenda.
far from being an insult, the cartoons point out that there are "moslems" who are insulting islam and we all find that offensive. what could be more insulting to your prophet than perverting a religion of peace to justify indiscriminate violence again the innocent?
if you want to get upset about something, get upset with the terrorists who abuse your faith and turn everyone against you. not the ones pointing this out.
jem, london, uk
At last!
Matt, Mids, UK
I can't believe it even got to court, but maybe it did to show clearly how utterly stupid the claim is. As for their claim - there *is* a link between Islam and terrorism, ,so what on earth is wrong in parodying this in a cartoon? If they are insulted by the facts, go off and be insulted; that's their choice. I am sick to death of the world being sued because people choose to be offended, or "take" offence. Simple: when faced with pure fact, choose not to, and don't be.
Laura Roberts, London, UK
Another victory for freedom of speech!
Rob, Wallasey,
I can't help thinking giles burgess is wrong comparing the offence caused by racial equality, gay rights, evolution, etc. it is not the intention of any of these to cause offence, so they should not be compared with insulting moslems deliberately.
however, s s ali (and the majority of moslem comment), the whole point of the cartoons is that they are not meant merely to insult islam, but rather to insult the hypocrisy or those who claim to follow islam, but are really using it as a cover for their own despicable agenda.
far from being an insult, the cartoons point out that there are "moslems" who are insulting islam and we all find that offensive. what could be more insulting to your prophet than perverting a religion of peace to justify indiscriminate violence again the innocent?
if you want to get upset about something, get upset with the terrorists who abuse your faith and turn everyone against you. not the ones pointing this out.
jem, london, uk
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
Next