Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

Imagine a machine the size of a photocopier which fills up with a fine white powder. Once it’s finished, you fish around in the powder and pull out a solid plastic model of whatever was on your computer screen, in full colour. Three-dimensional printing is gradually, and rather expensively, approaching the mainstream.
The real thing: If you’ve got $40,000, you can buy a Z Corp Z450 colour 3D printer, which is the real deal, straight out of Star Trek. It lays down layers of starch-based powder, zaps it into shapes and paints them different colours. It takes a few hours to make impossible-looking plastic models. There's a video of the Z450 in action here at YouTube, and here's the company home page.
The sugar printer: Physicist and blogger Windell Oskay got bored of waiting for an affordable 3D printer, so built his own. The Candyfab 4000 uses three sacks of granulated sugar, an aquarium pump, a car jack and some recycled printer parts. It works, and produces much larger and cheaper models than the professionals can. As they’re made of melted sugar, they’re also edible. Here's a Flickr set of the sugar printer in action.
Print yourself: Fabjectory rents time on a Z450. They use it to make and sell 6in high models of avatars – the characters players create to represent themselves in games like Second Life and World of Warcraft. For $100 and up, a Fabjectory rep will meet you in Second Life, virtually photograph you, and a beautiful little model will be on its way in a few days.
Impossible sculptures: Californian artist Bathsheba Grossman uses a truly extraordinary $425,000 machine that can print 3D objects in a mixture of stainless steel and bronze. She prints out intricate mathematical sculptures which are 3.5in across and cost $360. They’re the perfect gift for that special geek in your life.
Do it yourself: Because not everyone has the $7,000 for even the most basic commercial 3D printer, plenty of people are trying to build cheap 3D printers themselves. The RepRap project (slogan: 'Wealth without money') is based at Bath University. They're trying to develop a self-replicating machine: A cheap 3D printer which can print its own parts, and could ultimately cost as little as £300. For $3,000, you can already buy a Fabber kit from Fab@Home, to build a cool-looking perspex kit which makes rather blobby rubber objects.
Send your trends to microtrends@thetimes.co.uk
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The process is indeed remarkable but it seems pretty much like printing than sculpting or modeling. The objects are built in layers by spraying a medium (polymer, cells, sugar, whatever) that bind to each other. It is like ink-jet printing in this respect.
I have heard the difference between CAD/CAM rapid prototyping and 3d printing as "about $45,000". I think this is the nub here: it is a technology that is going to be popularized and taken out of the labs and put into homes. We all get to be pointed-headed engineers whipping out nifty knock-offs or one-offs. This makes for a pretty wild and interesting set of opportunities... a technology to get excited about!
Terry, Ottawa, Canada
CAD/CAM is far too 'technical' a term for it, unless speaking to someone who already knows a lot about it.
Calling it a 'printer of 3d objects' gets the message across effectively, and allows readers to see that it could benefit them!
not just those who are in the manufacturing industry/CAD/M.
The people who'd be honored by called it CAD/M are few when compared to the wholly ignorant of such things.
It's all about communication here, and I think the author did a good job of it, and should be proud.
Thankyou Tom Whitwell,
for this exciting and articulate portrayal of 3D printing/CAD
Tobias, Auckland,
while i agree with jerome's comment on how this is not really printing in the traditional sense, i also have to point out the fact that the product is called a "printer" by the manufacturer and it is not just the author of the article being "keen on printing".
swe, scottsdale, az
The process in the article "Microtrends: Printing in 3D" has nothing whatsoever to do with printing. The described process, in which successive layers of materials are solidified to eventually comprise a three-dimensional object, is called "sculpting." A perfectly good term for this process, "CAD/CAM," or computer-aided design/manufacturing, already exists. Indeed, to refer to this remarkable process as mere "printing" is to misrepresent and diminish it. Since the author is so keen on printing, I suggest they obtain and print for themselves a dictionary and a technical writing course.
Jerome, Pensacola, FL