The human body has its own multi frequency internal electromagnetic communication system.(internal EMF
This keeps our internal activity...all the cells... in tune. It is robust it organizes the healing performed continuously as cell die and are replaced and as new growth develops as children grow.
The bodies electomagnetic control system is sensitive to frequencies that are similar to its own but are external man made, not a part of human evolution:. EMF in E smog passes through walls and our body too invading it' s fine tuning with static that disturbs function. This invasion changes DNA changes the cell walls changes, the way the brain functions reducing stability. The research is available on the internet. At www.computer-clear we present a way to strengthen the bodies resistance to this man made noise. Children who use computers need protection. Children smoked not long ago. Tobacco popularity killed many. Will WiFI?. Take the threat seriously.

warren Brodey M.D., Oslo, Norway

when our son's epileptic fits suddenly got worse, we found out that a TETRA basestation mast had been tested on that day 50m from the supermarket where he became unwell. the mast was also only 300m from his school where a young girl who hadn't fitted for years began fitting again, but much worse than before. we had already refused to send our son back to the school, but the girl's mum reintroduced her on separate occasions and she fitted on each before the local authority allowed her home tuition.
some months later at home, we disabled our wi-fi to find that for the first time in 2 years our son went 6 weeks without having a fit.
please don't tell us that TETRA or wi-fi is harmless!

matt, haverfordwest, wales

Tosh.

Philip Andrews, London,

I can't comment on WI-FI, but mobile phone use next to my head gives me a raging headache and nausea the day later. I tell my son to use handsfree and text when possible, as the health concerns with mobile phones are legitimate.
I suspect that mobile phones will be the phalidomide of the next generation.

Sam, Derby , UK

DNA forms globlues nanometers to micrometers across, whilst wi-fis emit radio waves about 20cm in wavelength. So we are talking about trying to sink a ship by varying the tide. Whilst it is hard to be absolutely sure, you'd need pretty strong evidence to convince me of a danger.

Malcolm McLean, Bradford, UK

Give me a break. Lets make a disease for it, and lets make a new medication for it. Lets be a little bit more reasonable here. 'Health Risk?' Let's focus on the health problems that really matter instead of posing another health threat.

Cerge, OP FL, USA

It is perhaps more relevant to compare sitting in a classroom with wifi access points(transmitters) on all day in a school with sitting in the main beam from a phone mast.
We are talking of all day whole body exposure not short term exposure directed to the head as with a mobile phone.
The intenstiry of microwave radiation impacting a child from wifi access points will be of the same order of magnitude or more as from the main beam of a nearby phone mast.
Since the Stewart Report S1.42 said
'the beam of greatest RF intensity' from a macrocell base station sited within or near the grounds of a school should not be permitted to fall on any part of the school's grounds or buildings without agreement from the school and parents.
Presumably this means that there should be no wifi in schools either without parents consent?

Surely there must be some ethical guidelines that are being broken here?

Sue, London,