Richard Ford, Home Correspondent
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

Paedophiles will have to disclose their e-mail addresses to police when they go on the sex offenders register as part of measures to increase online safety.
Police will pass the details to social networking sites who will be expected to monitor offenders using the sites or bar them access.
Under the proposal announced today child sex offenders will face up to five years in prison for failing to give police an e-mail address or providing a false address.
The proposal is a further tightening of the registration requirements for the database, which last year included 30,416 names. Sex offenders currently register their name, address, date of birth and national insurance number.
But there is no central figure of the number of people convicted of sex crimes against the under 18s who will be covered by the new measure. The details of exact crimes are held by individual police forces.
Ministers are now also considering whether all sex offenders should also be required to register their mobile phone number.
The Home Office admitted that details of the scheme to make child sex offenders register their e-mail addresses so that social network sites can monitor them had yet to be worked out.
The proposal was so hurriedly produced by the Home Office that consulation with the industry has not taken place.
Asked about the resource implications for the industry, Annie Mullins, who headed the Government taskforce on child protection on the internet and is head of content standards at Vodafone, said:”We have not had discussions with the Government yet. These are complex and difficult questions for the industry.
“We have had no detailed briefing or understanding of these measures. We want to engage in major discussions about this”.
Vernon Coaker, a Home Office minister, said that the new registration requirement would be introduced after Parliament has passed legislation giving ministers a wider power to vary the the notification requirements for the register.
The measure is in the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill, currently in the Lords, which is expected to be in force by the autumn.
Mr Coaker said: “This is something that will be particularly useful in combating the possible grooming of children on the internet.
“We will work with the industry. It will be a matter of partnership between industry and law enforcement to make sure this law is made effective. “What we are looking at is how to protect children.”
The Home Office’s online safety guidance advises parents to discuss with their children how they should avoid putting themselves in compromising situations.
“It is important to discuss and establish boundaries with your child from an early age, about flirting online, especially when your child begins to show an interest and is beginning to use interactive services.
“Teenagers may engage in flirting or sexual exploration online, and it is important to discuss the need for boundaries in relationships even with known boyfriends and girlfriends.”
It warned youngsters not to post “sexually provocative or explicit” photographs of themselves.
Children should be urged to “think before they post”, particularly when material may involve “images from a party or of outrageous or compromising behaviour”.
The document also urged parents to learn about their children’s online activities, including which sites they use. “Negotiate with your child to visit and view all their profiles on social networking sites,” the guidance said.
Jim Gamble, chief executive of the Child Exploitation Online Protection Agency, said the guidance had the potential to "accelerate online child protection”.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
This is the most unimaginably stupid idea that the wastrels of government have ever misconceived. Somebody should explain to these overpaid underemployed imbeciles that neither perverts nor ordinary folk have their email addresses tatooed on their foreheads or embedded in a subcutaneous microchip, and that there is an infinite pool of addresses available at the drop of a keypress.
Or is this the first step in an altogether more sinister campaign of deprivation of freedom and enforcement of National ID?
Antonio, Estepona, Spain
UK Government + Internet = Clueless
Duncan, Bristol, UK
An entirely pointless and unenforceable idea. It's clear that those who advise the governement have no real idea as to how computers and the internet work.
As has already been mentioned, it takes seconds to register a new web based email address, for FREE. You can make as many as you like, giving no genuine personal details to the sites that provide them.
A better method would be to make them use only Static IP addresses, and give those details to these sites, allowing them to ban/monitor them more effectivly.
Even so, use of proxy servers would completely negate this idea, unless someone keeps track of all of them and these sites ban those as well.
But that would cost money.
Sab, Teignmouth, England
Another pointless unenforcable idea - that is unless you force EVERYBODY to register every email address.
-which is in fact the underlying agenda.
Peadophiles, terrorists, drug dealers are a fear excuse used by the government to frighten the the population into accepting ever more intrusion into their personal lives.
The best tactic to protect your children from peadophiles is to talk to your friends and neighbours, and family about the people you are leaving your children in the care of and about the people who live in your neighbourhood.
And remember your kid is much more likely to die from falling down the stairs then peadophile attack.
mark, leicester, UK
Convicted paedophiles should be baned from using or owning a computer, there should be a world wide data base of people excluded from the internet. Why not concider the requirement of having a licence to use a computer? They licence could form part of a long in, and without such, operation of a computer can not be started. People who allow others to use their computer risk being branded a paedophile in error, if misuse of their machine is allowed.
RayB , Newcastle, UK
Quote "This is something that will be particularly useful in combating the possible grooming of children on the internet" Unquote
Isn't it about time that Parents took on this responsibility? I am tired of Governments legislating for incompetent Parents.
Neillg, Harlow, UK
iI is clear that the only real punishment for such an evil,activity is to ban for life such people from using a pc for private use.
They should only be allowed to use a pc, for acceptable reasons, and only through public terminals.
At all times they must be monitored in the use of a pc,and report to police when they need to use one for any reason.
bill, Liverpool, uk
Yet again we see why this lot should not be allowed anywhere near computer systems, let alone put our details on them.
Let's just think of the governments successes in the field of Computers. There was the Child Support Agency, NHS Records, oh yes Child Benefit details going missing.
These are the SNAFU'S we have found out about.
I wouldn't trust this lot with a landline phone they'd probably bug themselves.
Howard, Basildon, England
Hilarious clueless Government gibber-gabber for the obvious reasons expressed by the other people who have commented, namely yeah a convicted criminal "registers" with his hotmail address and then uses his gmail one or a new one, or whatever, to continue his nefarious activities.
Chris, newcastle, uk
With email addresses being pretty much disposable as well as being free and easily available, how is this expected to be policed?
They can simply get a hotmail/Gmail/Yahoomail or any other webmail account and access it only from public terminals.
This is yet another example of a half-baked, technically unenforceable "good idea" from people who obviously have NO grasp of the technical aspects of the internet and web.
Andrew, st neots, Cambs
Is this what the Home Office spends their time doing? Any internet novice coudl tell them that you can get new email addresses within half a minute, so registering "the email address of a known paedophile" is absolutely meaningless.
Russell Harris, London, UK
Declare their email addresses? Does the home office know how long it takes to set up an email address? About 15 seconds.
So they can hand over one email address but happily indulge in whatever they indulge in with 100 different addresses.
Beate, Vilnius,
Surely they will just create new e-mail addresses and will then go un-detected again?
Enforcing privacy settlings for certain ages etc is a much safer way of running the social networking sites and protecting users.
John, Reading,
But can't they just sign up for a new anonymous email address? I don't understand how this stops anyone from doing anything.
MrSecrets, London,
"The proposal was so hurriedly produced by the Home Office that consultation with the industry has not taken place."
You don't say.
How long do you suppose it will take these people to go get another email address.
Guy , Ipswich,
Which over-paid policy wonk dreamt this one up. E-mail addresses are ten a penny these days. Apart from the free services there a dozens of low cost options - I have 5 e-mail addresses and could set another 10 in the next ten minutes. The same ease of access is true of mobile phones - all you need is a pre-pay sim and an old phone...ebay is full of these.
This is not a deterrent, itâs political PR.
Andrew Keen, Swansea, West Glamorgan