Jonathan Richards
Win tickets to the ultimate village fete with welly wanging and more
Video comment: How does YouTube police itself?
YouTube is facing criticism for making it too easy for people to upload violent or sexually explicit content to the internet after a 25-year-old mother was filmed while being raped.
A three-minute film showing the mother sexually assaulted by three boys after her drink had been spiked was uploaded soon after the incident, which took place in November.
In the clip, which was filmed with a mobile phone, the mother appears to be unconscious, with her head lolling from side to side, as she is repeatedly raped. Her two-year-old daughter and four-year-old son are heard crying in the background.
The mother, from South London, told the South London Press that she had been put through the ordeal after drinking champagne that had been spiked with a date-rape drug: "Three boys aged 14 to 16 did it and it was set up by two girls. They came round with a neighbour I trusted and I had no problems with them coming in for a while."
She said that she opened a bottle of champagne "to be social" and that within seconds of having a glass, she began to feel strange.
A video of the episode was later placed on YouTube, but the clip was quickly taken down after a local reporter complained about its graphic nature. It is understood to have been seen 600 times.
"Putting (the video) on the internet was an abomination," the mother said. "I was raped on film and you could hear my daughter and four-year-old son crying. I cannot understand how any website could show such a thing."
A panel of experts also recently told MPs conducting a review of child safety on the internet that sites such as YouTube should be prosecuted if they allowed "happy-slapping" videos to be posted.
A YouTube spokesman said that the site's rules prohibited content such as pornography and gratuitous violence from being uploaded. When people saw content that they thought was inappropriate, he said, they could flag it and it would be reviewed.
"If the content breaks our terms then we remove it and if a user repeatedly breaks the rules we disable their account," the spokesman said.
A source close to YouTube said it was impossible for the site to review every video that was posted because more than ten hours of content was uploaded every minute, but added that trained staff acted quickly to take down inappropriate content when it was flagged to them.
Since the mother came forward last month, the Metropolitan Police have begun an investigation into the incident and three teenagers - two aged 16 and one aged 14 - have so far been questioned.
YouTube has said that it co-operates with police when material relevant to an investigation is posted on the site.
Under UK law, sites that host videos posted by third parties must act "expeditiously" to disable access to them in the event of a complaint in order to avoid any liability that may result from the content appearing. Lawyers said that in this case, there may be liability that would stem from the publication of obscene material.
"It is extremely difficult for YouTube to control this kind of content because in this instance - where you have a video that may depict a crime - there's no technical measure the site can apply that will prevent it being posted in the first place," Struan Robertson, a technology lawyer with Pinsent Masons, said.
"The only option would be for them to review every video before it is posted and that is unrealistic. What sites like YouTube need is a good reporting mechanism which enables content to be flagged to the site once it has been posted, and YouTube operates well in this sense."
It is not the first time YouTube has been used as a forum for posting violent content. Last month a set of videos appeared on the site which showed students from Hitchin Boys' School, in Hertfordshire, apparently fighting with each other while bystanders looked on and gave them encouragement.
The footage has since been removed.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Get Times news, business and sport on your mobile. Text Times to 86626

Overseas contacts and local business information
2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
F/1989
£36,000
Hollingworth At Ombersley
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
90K plus bonus plus options
Confidential
London
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
£40,000 - £50,000 + benefits
Lloyds Pharmacy
Coventry
£38k
Barclaycard
Various Locations
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
What happened to this woman was horrible!!! I don't want to blame the victim but how is it o.k. to open up a bottle of champagne for a 14 & 16 year old? How old were the two girls who were with them? How did they spike the drink? Did she leave it alone with them? Be smart!
Mary, London,
They should jail them for doing such a crime, and put them in the Armley Prison where they will definatly learn not to do such a descriputal thing like rape. I myself have heard many different views from Armley convicts especailly about rapists.
jonny, Bradford, England
It is preposterous for YouTube to be held responsible for what other people upload to their website - especially since the site clearly states its rules for the type of material that is allowed. Once the video was reported, it was summarily removed from the website - it should therefore be forgotten as far as YouTube is concerned. In this day & age we cannot always shield everyone from viewing violent behavior. One should feel at least a bit gratified that it was removed at all. While it is a tragedy what the woman in the video was subjected to, it is nonetheless irrelevant to the debate about whether or not the site should be shut down. The real issue is the fact that every time truth about the apparent violent nature of many humans is witnessed by anyone, the first thing people/parents do is eliminate it, thereby perpetuating further ignorance and destroying any chance of enlightening people/children as to what is happening in their world, and how to change it for the better.
Keegan, Janesville, WI
You Tube is responsible for all content on the You Tube site, the same as any other site. The source of the content and how it is uploaded to the site is irrelevant. They develop, host , own, and profit from it. If the content itself breaks any applicable law, then You Tube is most certainly culpable. They do not get a free pass because You Tube is on the Internet. Napster already tried that.
matt, warrington,
These incidents are usually used to call for Internet Censorship. Unfortunately it's not unfeasible to censor the Internet, it's just going to totally ruin it. YouTube would nolonger be a portal to freedom but just another branch of Robert Maxwell.
If Internet censorship is the plan then the police will do all they can to make sure they don't prosecute anyone for this crime. The video evidence which got YouTube into trouble will not be enough to get the perpetrators into trouble. The authorities will be wanting more of this sort of thing, so they can shut these sites down.
Wayland, Braintree, UK
Some people are saying if YouTube can't 100% moderate all content before it goes up then it should be shut down. Of course there will be another YouTube clone but the same rule would apply. The same applies basically to the whole Internet. Except who are the censors and who are the content creators? Who censors the censors? The idea of censoring the whole Internet looks to be a popular idea. You maybe interested to know that YouTube contains hundreds of videos of allied soldiers torturing dogs and handgrenading shepards etc etc. If these get censored then what happens to the truth of this? Go on bury your head and not see any bad stuff.
Wayland Sothcott, Braintree, UK
But if the sex had been willing, then she would be charged with child molestation... Such a skinny, shaky line we walk with our laws that can destroy someone's life.
Mike, Michigan, USA
leon, did the mother realise what had happened to her before she saw the clip in youtube? and why hadn't she gone straight to the police? was it only the fact that the incident became public that prompted her?
jem, london, uk
If feel I must correct some commentors - Youtube is moderated.
You can visit sites on the internet showing far worse and to say that they must moderate content in the way described by some people here is akin to allowing a chalk-board to be used to post messages and then getting upset when people draw rude pictures on it after you gave them the chalk.
The internet is that chalk board and we all have chalk given to us by companies the world over.
The real issue here is that a violent sex crime happened and it was videoed, supossedly for the gratification of the people who comitted the crime.
I would suggest that as Youtube promptly took down the video once they became aware that they did their bit.
The people who put it up there should be locked up for life as they clearly do not have value for it.
If you want to remove access to the internet for some people then there needs to be a working solution that retains access for the lawfully minded.
Robert McGregor, Reading, UK
Am I missing something here? I think this whole situation is tragic - the fact that KIDS the age of 14 and 16 are raping a mother of two young children is horrible - where are their parents? But equally - why was a mother of two young children giving champagne to 14 and 16 year olds? She certainly did not deserve this in any way whatsoever - it's a shame we live in a world where humans do this to one another - but at some point we have to start taking responsibility for our actions and our children rather than blaming websites.
I hope the perpetrators are prosecuted and the victim and her family can put this horrible incident behind them.
A, London,
That is absolutely disgusting, YouTube is very popular with very young kids, some as young as 6-7?. To think that they may have watched this? YouTube should be sued. Not only does it have violent videos, some of it's comments are extremely racist and rude. It's free speech gone wild.
I say boycott it until they have moderation.
(most of the stuff on there is garbage anyway)
jayil, london, uk
disgusting thats all i can say..disgusting
l.a, Staffs,
Can the mobile that uploaded the film not be identified? Then the uploader could be prosecuted.
Better still, just close down You Tube and all its ilk. If China can police the Internet, why can't the west? (answer, because it doesn't want to....it would rather broadcast gang rape....)
janescott, London, UK
The answer is quite simple - YouTube should view every video BEFORE it is allowed on to the site. The woman should also sue them.
Andrew brown, derby, UK
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
Next