Ian Grant: Analysis
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
It’s not Big Brother but Big Bill Gates you need to worry about.
The application by Microsoft for a patent for systems to monitor people at work at lie-detector level will anger the usual suspects, such as civil liberties advocates and trade unionists. But those most at risk are office workers, middle managers — and even bosses. It could strain the fundamental trust, essential to all businesses, between boss and worker to breaking point.
Microsoft’s application covers work-related activity such as keystrokes, information searches and activity likely to breach legal and company regulations.
But the intention is also to monitor changes in heart rate, blood pressure, galvanic response, body temperature and facial expression. These are the basis of polygraph or lie-detector tests.
Next, the company wants to match these physical changes to psychological profiles. This could indicate that an individual is stressed or frustrated, thereby signalling that they need help.
Such constant feedback about how staff are doing should enable managers to smooth performance, to help them and to create a harmonious workplace. But if senior managers can use such a system it could render middle managers superfluous.
Some people, such as astronauts, fighter pilots and firefighters are closely monitored. However, these are people in life-or-death situations. They are not the office workers whom Microsoft is aiming to monitor. Call-centre workers complain that existing monitoring dehumanises their jobs.
However, there may be a bright side to Microsoft’s application. What if we could use it to see if we really could trust an estate agent’s description? Or a delivery man’s estimated time of arrival? What if the taxman could tell if someone were lying when filling in his online tax return?
The scariest aspect is that all the technology in Microsoft’s application already exists. Microsoft is simply packaging it and adding a management and control system.
But patents require novelty: no one should have produced a similar “work of art” before. So unless Microsoft can show that it really is being novel, we can breathe easy.
Ian Grant is an information security specialist at Computer Weekly
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Get Times news, business and sport on your mobile. Text Times to 86626


Overseas contacts and local business information

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Sorry Ian,
We can not breathe easy just because Microsoft might not get a patent on this. Microsoft could choose to sell the software anyway, regardless of patent (as long as it is not already patented by someone else).
The whole monitoring concept is intrusive and just another attempt by management to get the maximum amount of work for the least pay.
I note that in your article, it did not say that a benefit would be that management could determine when the workers are overworked or overstressed, and could reduce the work or the stress level appropriately.
Better quality of work makes workers more productive. Additional monitoring does not.
Jim, damascus, maryland, USA