Jonathan Richards
Pick up classic Hitchcock thrillers all this week, only in The Times
Universal Music Group, the world's largest record company, has refused to renew a long-term contract with Apple to sell music downloads through its iTunes store, paving the way for exclusive deals with competitors, according to reports.
Universal has decided not to renew a two-year agreement to sell the music and videos by artists such as U2 and 50 Cent via iTunes, and will instead sell content on the site on a month-by-month basis, leaving open the option to do exlusive deals with other services, an industry source said.
The decision does not mean that Universal's vast catalogue of arists — which also includes Eminem and Sting — will be removed from the iTunes store any time soon, but suggests that the label is searching for greater flexibility in the way that it sells its content online, potentially weakening Apple's dominant position in the downloadable music market.
Apple holds a 70 per cent share in the music download market in the US, and is the third-largest retailer of music overall in the US, behind Wal-Mart and Best Buy.
Universal previously had a two-year agreement to provide content to Apple's iTunes site, which was extended by 12 months last summer, but since it expired last month, the deal has not been renewed, the source said.
Neither Apple nor Universal was immediately available for comment.
Rebecca Jennings, an analyst at Forrester, said: "This is a bit of gamesmanship on Universal's part. Apple can't afford to have to turn around to its customers and say it no longer offers Universal's catalogue, and Universal is hoping is that this may prompt Apple to renegotiate their revenue split."
"Apple's monopoly in the music download market has come to be a source of unease for the record industry in the past couple of years."
Since the iTunes service was launched for 4 years ago, Apple has been dispute with the record labels over issues such as pricing - Apple insists that all tracks sell for 79p (99c in the US), and the inability of tracks downloaded via iTunes to be played on devices other than the iPod.
Record labels have wanted to introduce variable pricing for their music, and Universal in particular has shown itself willing to explore different models, agreeing to make its entire catalogue available for free on Spiralfrog, an advertising-supported service which was due to launch in December.
In April, Apple announced a deal with EMI to sell tracks without digital rights management (DRM) protection - allowing them to be played on other devices - for a higher price of 99p. So far the other labels have failed to follow suit.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Get Times news, business and sport on your mobile. Text Times to 86626



Overseas contacts and local business information

Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It seems a bit odd to me that Universal would make such a big deal out of iTunes. First off, It is common knowledge that online sales represent a small fraction of total yearly music sales in the music industry. Secondly, (here we go again) it's not Apple's fault that no one else seems to be doing things as good as Apple is. If iTunes is the public's choice as the place to shop, then I would think Universal would not want to upset the apple cart...so to speak. Is the iTunes store the only place to purchase Universal's music online? I don't know for sure, but I doubt it.
I'd say it boils down to more of a "you can't boss us around" pride thing with Universal. Apple has done them well.
JJB, Burnsville, USA
I think that things should just stay the way they are because iTunes costermes are happy. Also anyone running or is helping run iTunes should feel proud and want peoples happiness. To get our happiness don't change iTune because anyone "feels" like it, wants more money, etc.
Jackie, Goleta, California
Apple make next to nothing in terms of profit with the iTunes Store, and other online stores are probably making losses.
As the Top 40 singles sales chart is dominated by Apples iTunes Store sales, if Universal do go ahead and pull all their content from the iTunes Store the only people being hurt will be Universal themselves and their Artists - NOT Apple.
Remember over 90% of music on iPods comes from CDs not the iTunes Store.
Steve Jobs should tell Doug Morris CEO of Universal Music Group to take a long walk off a short pier.
John Lockwood, London, UK
You need a proofreader ...
Tom, Boulder, Colorado, US
it is about time that "apple" is not being treated as the cool kid on the block. Thank you.
Nina Satterfield, Bay Point,
Surely there is a point that if you own a digital library, it is in the best interests of your shareholders to market it centrally and to allow ALL interested parties to affiliate to the content so that it can be downloaded in multiple formats for all users?
That way, the market segment open to the company is maximised and the benefit to the downloader (the poor mushoroom in all of this) is best served....but then again, I never did get this stitch the user market ethos sorted out
John, Malaga, Spain
I download a lot of music through the ITunes store and having universal remove it music is stupid. They wud loose so much money in the end.
Kyle, oak harbor, Washington
Apple would be best off getting rid of all the stuff in Universals' catalog that is not or hardly moving and stick with the stuff that actually sells. Furthermore, I do believe that Universal is slowly becoming aware that the industry has changed and will change more. Eventually, it will be the likes of Apple that sign on artists for distribution; with the evaporation of "physical" media they will slowly become obsolete. They simply came too late. They cannot live without Itunes. Prostituting their catalog towards smaller digital distributors and threatening with "exclusive" deals is plain stupid.
hen, maastricht,