Jonathan Richards
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Facebook, the fast-growing social network, has been forced to update its privacy settings after it was pointed out that users may unwillingly have been exposing certain personal details on the site.
Privacy officers at Facebook were alerted to the problem by a blog post which claimed that, even if users had set their profile to 'private', certain information - such as their sexual preference and religious beliefs - could be revealed in a search of the site.
The situation meant that anyone could search for a user's name and, by narrowing the query according to various categories, find out details that the user did not intend to disclose.
Defenders of the site said that users had always been able to limit what people browsing could find out about them using the search function, but Facebook administrators said that it had been a mistake not to have the privacy settings in search accord by default with those in a user's profile.
"If you undertook an advanced search, it may have been possible to see a piece of information in a person's profile, even if that profile was private," Chris Kelly, chief privacy officer at Facebook told Times Online.
"Information that was available through search did not adequartely match the information in a profile, but we've now fixed that," he said, adding that the site's "mission" remained to leave control over information "in the hands of users."
In a blog post that was picked up widely on the internet, Chris Soghoian wrote: "A large number of (Facebook) users have gone to the effort to restrict who can view their profiles, but many, unfortunately, remain exposed to a trivial attack."
The post was picked up on Wired.com, and soon after, Facebook representatives replied on Mr Soghoian's blog that the site had updated its settings "so that profile information that has been made private by a user, such as gender, religion, and sexual orientation, will not return a result."
Anna Martinez, 29, who has used Facebook since November, said: "The whole reason Facebook is so appealing to people who don't normally go online to socialise is the selectivity about who gets to see your stuff and who doesn't," Anna Martinez, 29, who has used Facebook since November, said.
"I set my privacy setting so that only my "friends" could see me. To discover that people might have been able to find out information through this loophole makes me feel vulnerable, and a little scared."
A spokesman for the Information Commissioner's Office said: "We would continue to warn people that there are risks associated with posting information online, and urge them to give out personal information with great care."
Facebook had 3.2 million visitors in the UK in May, making it the third most popular network behind MySpace and Bebo.
Its audience has increased by more than 500 per cent in the past 6 months - nearly 20 times the growth rate of MySpace's.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Oh dear.. when will people learn. If you put information on-line it is potentially available for anyone to access, despite any assurances to the contrary. Don't blame Facebook... just don't take the chance. If you don't want everyone to know your sexual preferences for example, don't post them on line - full stop.
I am always fully aware that if I give any information to any organisation, be it on-line or otherwise, it is potentially available to anyone. While I might just trust, say, my bank or a government department (ho ho) - and probably couldn't get the product or service I want without divulging some information - I certainly wouldn't trust a site like Facebook!!
Why don't these people grow up and be a little less naive about what they're doing and expecting.
Stuart, Halifax, UK
Of course, to exploit this "flaw" the user must first have that information in his/her profile, and the searcher must search for the specific user and the specific phrase. It's not a global search bug.
Hilary, Birmingham,