Gary Duncan, Economics Editor
Pick up your copy of Love: Forever Changes at WHSmith today
Eighteen million families will be left £150 worse off next year and in 2010
unless Alistair Darling extends last week’s emergency tax cut to compensate
losers from his scrapping of the 10p tax band, according to a leading
think-tank.
In findings that will ratchet up pressure on the Chancellor, the Institute for
Fiscal Studies (IFS) says that well over half of all households, including
millions of the poorest, will be left poorer over the next two years as last
week’s one-off rise in tax allowances vanishes along with higher winter fuel
payments and as national insurance payment rises.
The IFS turns up the heat on Mr Darling still more as it also finds that, even
after the £2.7 billion compensation in last week’s mini-Budget, millions
still face bigger tax bills this year from the end of the 10p income tax
band, with 900,000 of the poorest families still losing out.
This is despite the institute’s estimate that the Chancellor is now taking
away £5.5 billion less this year through tax, national insurance, tax credit
and benefit changes. This is the biggest such package since the 2001
election year, it says. Yet it finds that the abolition of the 10p band
still means that six million individuals under 65 earning between £6,635 and
£13,255 will pay more income tax this year, even after the higher personal
allowances put in place last week.
The blow to many is offset as most live with a partner who will gain more than
they lose. However, the IFS estimates that, after taking this into account,
about 900,000 families with an average income after tax and benefits of
£11,800 are still left worse off by the Budget.
Among those who will still lose this year are 500,000 single adults under 25
without children, another 115,000 childless single people aged 25 to 55 and
140,000 childless couples aged 25 to 55. Mr Darling’s Budget changes mean
that these people lose an average of £83 a year, with the poorest facing the
biggest losses.
The already severe political headache for the cash-strapped Chancellor over
his next move is made still more acute as the IFS tells him that millions
more people will be turned into big Budget losers unless he finds the funds
to make this year’s bigger personal tax allowance permanent.
Yet the IFS report, which is published today, underlines how Mr Darling has
left himself severely boxed-in, with the Treasury’s finances already deep in
the red and most options for a more generous PreBudget Report in the autumn
and 2009 Budget likely to prove very expensive.
The IFS says that the Chancellor confronts a stark choice between allowing
millions of people to lose from his next Budget, or letting public borrowing
climb.
Higher borrowing would raise the spectre of big postelection tax increases, as
well as leading the Treasury to breach, by up to £5 billion, its
“sustainable investment” rule that caps public debt at 40 per cent of
national income, the institute finds.
Robert Chote, the IFS director, said: “By announcing a big one-off increase in
the personal income tax allowance, Alistair Darling has not only created
millions of winners this year; he has created millions of potential losers
next year.”
Mr Chote argued that the Chancellor was likely to be afraid to leave people
worse off, so that public borrowing is likely to take the strain. But he
sounded a warning that this would “further undermine the credibility of the
Government”.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
c. £90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
£
Not Specified
The Bar Standards Board
London
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
A way out for the Government could be to hike up the minimum wage from 1st of April substantially to a recommended £8 per hour ,this would at one stroke help the poorest families and increase tax revenue while stopping the poorest paying employers making profits by paying their staff a pittance ?
J GARY STEIN, inverurie, scotland
Yes they've taxed us, spent it (wastefully) and now they haven't got anything left to bail the country out of this messs they have got us in. Roll on revolution.
David Nammory, Liverpool.,
Yes you can increase tax take by reducing the amount of tax you take. Ken Clarke did it. It is well known that the more money you and I have in our pocket the more we will spend thus leading to more tax intake for the goverment from indirect taxation.
Dave, Mold, Flintshire
Of course people are going to be worse off, that's what increasing tax does. Or did you think that the chancellor can increase tax revenue without anyone being worse off?
Mike Poulsen, Reading, Berkshire
I can't understand how all the clever people in the Ministries of This and That failed to foresee the consequences of their decisions. I thought that is what these people are employed for, I thought that is why they get their comfortable salaries and generous pensions. What is it they do all day?
Jaimie, Scarborough, UK
"The IFS says that the Chancellor confronts a stark choice between allowing millions of people to lose from his next Budget, or letting public borrowing climb."
...or cutting bloated government spending!
Kevin, Liverpool, UK