Jonathan Richards in San Francisco
Pick up your copy of Joy Division: Closer at WHSmith today
Viacom ramped up its offensive against Google yesterday, saying that it would not back down from its $1 billion lawsuit against the internet search engine.
Philippe Dauman, Viacom's chief executive, said that Google had not done enough to prevent content from being illegally uploaded to YouTube, and gave no impression that a settlement was near to being reached.
Viacom, the entertaiment company which owns MTV and Nickelodeon, claims that Google allowed more than 160,000 clips of its programming to be uploaded to YouTube, the video-sharing website it owns.
Google denies that is infringeing Viacom's copyright, and claims that it removes unauthorised videos from YouTube when asked to by content owners.
Speaking at an internet conference in San Francisco, Mr Dauman said that he had "an open mind" about reaching an agreement with Google, which he described as a "responsible company", but that a settlement "wasn't quite there yet".
Referring to Google's proposed solution to the problem, a filtering system which allows new content being uploaded to be checked against a database of copyright material, he said: "They have a lot of tools, but they're not perfect. What no-one wants is a proprietary system that benefits one company to the exclusion of others."
Mr Dauman said that what he would prefer would be an industry standard system, adding that it was "beyond the capacity of a company like ours, let alone smaller ones", to cope with a range of filtering technologies.
Earlier in the day Viacom and a range of other content producers, including Disney, CBS, Fox and NBC, as well as internet companies such as Microsoft and MySpace, announced that they would collaborate on a technology which would prevent users from uploading unauthorised material.
Google was not a party to the list, although analysts said it was not feasible that it continue to use its own technology while the rest of the internet and content industries were working to a common standard.
There was "a developing consensus among content creators and distributors" that whilst it was important content be widely available via the internet, there needed to be "rules of the road", Mr Dauman told an assembled audience at the Web 2.0 Summit in San Francisco.
The complaint of media companies such as Viacom is that they should bear part of the onus - and cost - of policing sites such as YouTube, onto which vast amounts of content are uploaded each day, for unauthorised content.
Google argues that it complies with the terms of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), and takes down copyright-infringeing material when requested to do so by the copyright owner.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
Competitive package
Npower
Midlands
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Go ahead I double dare you! No, I take that back, I triple dare you. Start a web site and see if the contents of it arenât stolen shortly to be put on some Google Adsense site. Google makes billions of dollars from copyright infringement. Once some State AG files notice to see all the DMCA's at Google somebody is going to wonder why these people are "chest deep" in all these DMCA notices.
I mean really who in their right minds would buy You Tube a portal chiefly known for harboring stolen content. Now Google lawyers up to protect its First Ammendment rights when the constitution was never meant to protect "crap" like this. The sad fact is Google has involved so many people in copyright infringement that many don't want it to end and attacks everybody who might deal a blow to this "golden goose"
Jon Baker, Charlotte, nc
Shave up and stop humming.. Its a big world out there.. get some sunshine once in a while. Most businesses I know are in it to make money., not to give it away, including google. Ask google to give away its highly guarded secrets. just because you can steal copyrighted material does not mean that it becomes ethical. Same as its not ethical and is criminal to steal from another's house just because you could. If businesses cannot match up to free distribution and others can I say thats fair game. But not when someone says I will steal your stuff and use it for free. If it was meant to be free, then its a different story. But its not, they spend millions making each show and try to earn it from sales afterwards. But if you stepped out and breathed a bit you would also come up with sensible and profitable innovations as the doubl click. You wouldnt invent the single click from where you are now.
ATF, NY, Ny
If you go to youtube you can find tons of copy written material any time of day...they are making money from others creative works without compensating the artists and owners of the content. This might sound OK when its big company vs big company, but conceptually it allows people to simply steal the work of others and profit from its distribution without any responsibility. The technology Google released forces content owners to be responsible for making sure Google isn't violating their rights, that is ridiculous, Google should be responsible for making sure they are not stealing from others.
Mike, Yonkers, NY
For God sakes, Viacom...live with it. What a bunch of money hungry babies. These lawsuits and sookie attitudes have got to stop and the courts should throw out all these suits including the silly riaa and other dumb "copyright" ones. Once something is broadcast... ANYWHERE... it should become public domain. It is bad enough the retards let someone have the double mouse click as a patent, whats next, taking a breath of air??? This silliness has to stop soon.
Unshaven, Moncton, Canada
i agree
Hummer, Houston, Tennessee