Dan Sabbagh
Subscribe to The Times and The Sunday Times
Virgin Media’s carriage dispute with rival BSkyB was heading down to the wire after the cable group rejected Sky’s latest offer amid an increasingly acrimonious war of words.
Late on Monday night, Virgin Media rejected the latest set of proposals from Sky – which is 39.1 per cent owned by News Corporation, parent company of The Times – without proposing an alternative.
Steve Burch, the chief executive of Virgin Media, said that Sky’s latest set of proposals amounted to “smoke and mirrors” and a determination “to use their market power to bully competitors”.
Sky, however, indicated that it wanted a 19 per cent increase in the fee it charged Virgin Media for access to its entertainment and news channels. Virgin Media said that the extra money excluded payments for new services, such as high definition content and extra channels such as Sky Three. Virgin Media continued to describe Sky’s latest offer as amounting to a doubling of the existing carriage cost, which amounts to about £25 million, based on certain minimum guarantees provided by the cable operator.
A Sky spokesman said: “The emotive tone and intensity of Virgin Media’s communications do the company no credit. Virgin’s management appears to have a greater interest in denigrating Sky through a public relations offensive than in delivering real benefits to customers.”
An agreement to carry Sky’s entertainment channels expires on Thursday. In theory, the channels could be dropped from the cable operator, costing the satellite broadcaster £15 million to £20 million in operating profit this year.
However, it was possible that negotiations could continue for a period if both sides were willing to try to reach a settlement.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Great Investment, River Views
New York Christmas Shopping
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
very biased and unbalanced summary for this news item where is the supposedly "emotive" Virgin response? why is it that only the Sky point of view is presented?
Kim, Brighton, UK
As of 21.00 28/2/07 Virgin are still advertising Sky one as part of their TV packages (do the still hold hope of keeping them on channel?) As a Virgin customer the lost of Sky from my cable would make me switch provider (taking phone and broadband too), unless a substantial discount is applied to my bill. (recent price rises had been attributed to cost of sky packages). Why can't all non free to view channels be individually purchased by the customer to truly have a flexible viewing package?
Jon, Portsmouth, UK
An NTL customer writes: It's good to see someone standing up to the Murdoch empire (even if it's another media empire with slightly better PR - local gym just went to Virgin too, nice free rucksack though). Having said that three of the only four programmes I watch regularly (24, Lost and Battlestar Galactica) are on Sky One. So if NTL lose Sky One in this interesting bit of brinkmanship I'm off to satellite.
Brian, London, UK